Anyway, this film is far from perfect, but what it's attempting to explore is a bit mind boggling. The guy's quite a bit more handsome than me and everything's done with a light touch, but somehow, he's effective and simultaneously non- threatening, if that's the word. Katherine Heigl is a known, reliable entity who's graced many a movie, but the real discovery for me was Josh Duhamel who conveyed all of his feelings to me, another guy, extremely well in situations I've never really encountered, perhaps better and more agreeably than any other male lead I can think of. As a mere film lover, I have no idea how the two leads managed to make this script believable, but they did. A review will be posted online at when one becomes available.My wife's choice of film made me miss "The Town" and "The Social Network" which I preferred, but I'm not regretting this night. “My Soul to Take” - the latest spooker from director Wes Craven - opens today but was not screened in advance for critics. It’s turns out be a pleasure to spend a couple of hours in their company. These two actors generate a chemistry that, even if it doesn’t set the multiplex on fire, is endearingly modest: They’re fully aware that they haven’t stepped into the most original romantic comedy in cinema history, but that doesn’t stop them from giving it their all. In the future, she might do well to mix it up a bit, but for now this is a believable and touching portrait of a woman with so much on her plate she can barely pause to contemplate what she wants out of life.ĭuhamel, who until now has come off as little more than set decoration, takes a cliched part - the ne’er-do-well playboy who learns to embrace traditional values - and lends it far more nuance than it deserves. Heigl keeps playing this same fussbudget part, in movies like “27 Dresses” and “The Ugly Truth” - a high-strung woman terrified she’s on the verge of spinsterhood. What’s less expected is the sure-footed direction by Greg Berlanti (a very good TV writer-director who, among other things, created “Everwood”), who mostly keeps the sitcomish slapstick to a minimum, and focuses instead on the sincere performances by Heigl and Duhamel, who are both better than they’ve ever been. This works well enough for awhile (or at least long enough for the filmmakers to stage a cutesy-cuddly montage sequence) until the inevitable problems emerge. Holly and Messer - who had a disastrous blind date three years earlier when their friends first tried to set them up - aren’t ready for the job of parenthood, but the point of “Life as We Know It” is that nobody is: You just puzzle your way through, and hope you don’t cause any bodily trauma or lasting psychological scarring to the kid.ĭespite the fact that these two career-minded adults can barely tolerate one another, they decide to move into their dead friends’ house and split the child-rearing duties. Hollywood must really be running out of ideas if it needs to stage gruesome car accidents to effectuate a “meet-cute” - but once you get past the shamelessness, “Life as We Know It” turns into a reasonably honest consideration of what it might mean to have to honor the dead by raising their living, breathing, pooping, screaming progeny. Think “Three Men and a Baby” crossed with the last 15 minutes of “Beaches.” That’s the tasteless, if effective, premise of “Life as We Know It,” a sweet-natured romantic comedy that finds control freak Holly (Katherine Heigl) thrown together with the carefree womanizer Eric (Josh Duhamel), who goes by his last name Messer, first by grief over their mutual best friends’ death, and then by the daunting task of raising 1-year-old Sophie. What would happen if your best friends unexpectedly died and named you and your sworn enemy the guardians of their surviving child?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |